In my ad hoc taxonomy, every population divides into two flavours: Those driven by a sense of duty and those motivated by a sense of entitlement. (It's unfortunate that many see union members as entitlement driven. My experience is the opposite: Unionists are overwhelmingly duty driven — duty to their fellows and their fellows' welfare, their trade.)
To children we say, "with privileges come responsibilities" — a quid pro quo. For the philosophers, however, duty holds a more substantive place. In his Enchiridion (manual), for example, Epictetus's 'duties' are inextricably tied to relationships: "In this manner, therefore, you will find, from the idea of a neighbor, a citizen, a general, the corresponding duties...."
Commitment to duty is blind to political affiliation and deaf to any particular religious doctrine. "Someone you can count on," refers to a person motivated by duty. These are the colleagues (collaborators, subordinates, and bosses) to seek out. ▪
When the weak want to give an impression of strength
they hint menacingly at their capacity for evil.
—Eric Hoffer (1902-1983)
they hint menacingly at their capacity for evil.
—Eric Hoffer (1902-1983)